European-American
Topics - Politics
-
How
Northern Ireland survived terrorism
By Dean Broadbent
Posted:
March 2006
For
years, the Irish Republican Army’s refusal to abandon
violence has been the main obstacle to peace and progress
in Northern Ireland
Last
year saw two momentous and promising events. In July,
the IRA announced that it would pursue its goals through
"exclusively peaceful means" and then, in September,
came the decommissioning of most of the IRA’s weaponry.
In the months since, however, Northern Ireland has not
flourished into a harmonious democracy as might have been
hoped.
The
disarming of the IRA should not be underestimated. In
a very real way, it signals the end of more than thirty
years of Republican violence.
The
fact that the IRA has been effectively disarmed is something
that seemed altogether impossible just a few years ago.The
change can largely be attributed to the developments of
the ‘war on terror'. Since 9/11 and the bombings
of Madrid and London, armed conflict within Western democracies
has become utterly unacceptable, depriving the IRA of
once strong support in the United States.
The
rewards of this have been swift, with Northern Ireland
Secretary Peter Hain saying that a return to devolved
government is a “real possibility in the near future.”
Hopes were high that The Irish Question might finally
have received a satisfactory answer.
There
remain, however, deep political obstacles to the resumption
of devolved government at Stormont. Much of the problem
is that the same politicians that have led a generation
of conflict, division and opposition are those now responsible
for trying to create a worthy peace. Sinn Fein –
the political manifestation of the IRA – remains
an organisation stifled and controlled by its leadership,
whilst the Democratic Unionist Party is imbued with Protestant
sectarianism. DUP leader Ian Paisley said the suggestion
that the IRA has completely disarmed – the decommissioning
took place in private - was a “blatant lie,”
although the integrity of the witnesses means that this
statement has been perceived as evidence that the weapons
issue is being used as an excuse to avoid cooperation.
Having defined themselves for decades by their opposition
to IRA violence, the Unionist parties seem lost for positive
policies. There is also the small matter that none of
the main loyalist paramilitary groups have shown any sign
of following the IRA’s example.
The problems are not merely political, either. During
the ceasefires there may have been less violence, but
there has been a steady increase in social segregation
and “peace walls.” It has become a cultural
war, with fights about the meaning of history and fierce
disputes over parades. Northern Ireland is as divided
by sectarianism as it ever was, and this has become entrenched
with the duplication of services between the two main
communities. The continuing activity of the IRA remains
a serious concern: the $46m bank robbery of December 2004
- blamed on the IRA by the police and UK government –
confirmed the suspicions of many that the IRA and criminality
are inextricably linked. In January 2005, IRA members
were accused of killing Belfast man Robert McCartney,
making the IRA’s professed dedication to peace even
harder to take seriously.
By any measure, Northern Ireland has come a long way in
the past few years. The removal of violence from the political
scene reveals Northern Ireland’s underlying problems
in all their intractable complexity. This is real progress,
but the biggest lesson than needs to be learned is that
it will require more honesty and bravery to heal Northern
Ireland’s wounds than even it did to end its war.
©
2007 All content property of European Weekly unless where otherwise
accredited