It has often been said that Switzerland lies in the
heart of Europe, being located west of Austria and Lichtenstein,
to the east of France, to the north of Italy and to
the south of Germany. To no surprise, four different
languages are spoken in this small country, French,
German, Italian and Romansh, a Latin derivative. The
“Cultural Melting Pot” of Europe may closely
describe Switzerland and its people.
Politically, Switzerland did not become a sovereign
state until 1848. Before that time it had existed as
a loose alliance of independent cantons, free to manage
their own affairs within or outside a union. But in
1848 Switzerland became a federal state with a constitution
that united the cantons in a federation that struck
a fair balance between a central power and the rights
of the individual cantons.
Economically, the mountainous terrain provides an enormous
resource of waterpower which generates electricity to
power industrial machinery with which manufactured goods
are produced. Although most of all raw material has
to be imported, Switzerland has shown its industrial
capacity by a continued increase in exports. Watches,
for instance, became world famous and Swiss banks became
another claim to fame. They guarantee the depositor
absolute secrecy of his account. Even tax collectors
of foreign Governments are excluded from checking on
transactions with Swiss banks, much to the delight of
an income tax evading investor. In addition, Switzerland
successfully exports instruments, machinery, chemicals
and medicinal products.
In view of the economic developments in Europe since
WWII it seems remarkable that Switzerland resists joining
the EU. Totally surrounded by EU member states, it seemingly
has encapsulated itself economically from its neighbors
and the rest of Europe. However, that is not quite the
case. Trade relations flourish and exports to EU countries
are second only to the US. Switzerland’s reluctance
to join in with its trading partners is, therefore,
somewhat puzzling. Particularly so, when considering
its early efforts to negotiate terms of agreements with
the European Economic Community (EEC) in1957, an organization
which took first steps towards European economic unity.
In spite of the fact that France objected to expand
the EEC beyond the original six trading partners (Belgium,
France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, West Germany),
Switzerland continued to negotiate for free trade agreements
with the EEC on a bilateral basis. Agreements were reached
on terms that Switzerland was allowed to retain its
neutrality, federalism and democratic policies. After
that, many special treaties were negotiated in a bilateral
arrangement over the next few decades.
When in 1992 the Swiss Federal Counsil submitted a request
for EU membership, bringing in line Swiss laws with
those of the European Community (EC), the majority of
the cantons objected. And so it was back to square one,
issue by issue negotiations with the EU. But while these
early efforts “withered on the vine” Switzerland
nonetheless declared that EU membership remains a long-term
objective.
The typical pragmatic behavior of the Swiss was recently
reported in the NZZ (Neue Züricher Zeitung). At
the national party convention of the rightwing People’s
Party in December, the delegates called for an immediate
withdrawal of the dormant EU membership application,
now collecting dust in Berne as well as in Brussels.
Secondly, their stated opposition for entry into the
EU was based on several issues, foremost the required
payment of cohesion funds of $ .76 billion as part of
the sixteen-point agreement package contained in the
application. Emphasis was also placed on the party’s
insistence on total protection of Swiss sovereignty
and democratic policies. In a speech the justice minister
Christoph Blocher said: “The desire to attach
Switzerland to the EU has been too great in the administration
and politics.” Swiss president and party representative
Samuel Schmid also stated that bilateral negotiations
should continue in the future, addressing problem areas
item by item and not in a package deal. The delegation
further recommended that Switzerland’s economic
policy should avoid focusing on the EU’s “closed
market” and look for trades with other countries
on other continents.
Why the Swiss stubbornly holding back when it seems
that being an EU member offers advantages over and above
free trade, a common currency and open borders, for
instance, may not be easily understood. Their apparent
love for freedom and elbow room to maneuver economically
probably stems from the times when cantons were united
in an alliance allowing them to do “their own
thing.” Their neutral position in both World Wars
underlines this tendency. And the story of William Tell,
in which he refused to take off his hat when ordered
drives home the point that love of freedom of the Swiss
people transcends all else including economic ambitions.
In summation, Switzerland’s long-term objectives
are coupled with special conditions for resuming negotiations
for membership. First, bilateral agreements reached
in 1999 need to be tested to see if and how they work
in the real world. Second, the pros and cons of EU membership
need to be thoroughly clarified by the Federal Counsil,
addressing how the country’s rights, political,
economical, and financial and foreign policies are affected.
Third and finally, broad support for entry into the
EU must be assured.